Màn hình giọt nước 6.5 inch của chiếc điện thoại Oppo này có kích thước lớn, cho trải nghiệm ấn tượng không chỉ hình ảnh, video mà còn đồ họa game nữa. Ngoài ra thiết bị còn có chế độ lọc ánh sáng xanh có hại tránh mỏi mắt, giúp bảo vệ cửa sổ tâm hồn của bạn. Home > Smartphone comparison > Galaxy A31 vs Oppo A53 – which one to choose? Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.4-inch Samsung Galaxy A31 (with Mediatek Helio P65) that was released on March 24, 2020, against the Oppo A53, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 and came out 5 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the gadgets. - Differences
- Review
- Specs
- Benchmarks
- Battery life
- Camera
- Comments
An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A31 - 53% higher pixel density (411 vs 269 PPI)
- Delivers 33% higher maximum brightness (632 against 476 nits)
- 17% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (190K versus 163K)
- Has an ultra-wide angle camera lens
- Super AMOLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- 38% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 345 and 250 points
Reasons to consider the Oppo A53 - Higher display refresh rate – 90 Hz
- Stereo speakers
- Faster storage type - UFS 2.1 versus eMMC 5.1
You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD | Size | 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches | Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 720 x 1600 pixels | Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 | PPI | 411 ppi | 269 ppi | Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz | HDR support | No | No | Screen protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 82.9% | Display features | - Always-On Display | - | Display tests RGB color space | 96.8% | - | PWM | 238 Hz | - | Response time | 8 ms | - | Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - | Sources: NotebookCheck [3] Height | 159.3 mm (6.27 inches) | 163.9 mm (6.45 inches) | Width | 73.1 mm (2.88 inches) | 75.1 mm (2.96 inches) | Thickness | 8.6 mm (0.34 inches) | 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) | Weight | 185 gramm (6.53 oz) | 186 gramm (6.56 oz) | Waterproof | No | No | Rear material | Plastic | Plastic | Frame material | Plastic | Plastic | Colors | White, Black, Blue, Red | Black, Blue, Green | Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, rear | Tests of Samsung Galaxy A31 and Oppo A53 in the benchmarks SoC Chipset | Mediatek Helio P65 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 | Max. clock | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz | CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) | Architecture | - 6 cores at 1.7 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75 | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 240 Silver - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 240 Gold | Lithography process | 12 nanometers | 11 nanometers | Graphics | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 | GPU clock | 820 MHz | 600 MHz | FLOPS | ~56.4 GFLOPS | ~273 GFLOPS | Memory RAM size | 4 GB | 4 GB | Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X | Memory clock | 1866 MHz | 1800 MHz | Channels | 2 | 2 | Storage Storage size | 64, 128 GB | 64, 128 GB | Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 | Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD | Memory card max. size | Up to 512 GB | Up to 256 GB | CPU | 67651 | 54225 | GPU | 32355 | 29411 | Memory | 35166 | 41881 | UX | 55884 | 38497 | Total score | 190453 | 163323 | 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability | 97% | 98% | Graphics test | 3 FPS | 1 FPS | Graphics score | 572 | 240 | PCMark 3.0 score | 6288 | 5924 | ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result Operating system | Android 10 (Can be upgraded to Android 11) | Android 10 (Can be upgraded to Android 11) | ROM | One UI 3.1 | ColorOS 7.2 | OS size | 27 GB | - | Specifications Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | Charge power | 15 W | 18 W | Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po | Replaceable | No | No | Wireless charging | No | No | Reverse charging | No | No | Fast charging | Yes, Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (50% in 60 min) | Yes (50% in 50 min) | Full charging time | 2:25 hr | 1:55 hr | Battery life tests Web browsing | 14:31 hr | - | Watching video | 16:40 hr | - | Gaming | 05:44 hr | - | Standby | 126 hr | - | Phones With the Best Battery Life Specs and camera test of smartphones Main camera Matrix | 48 megapixels | 13 megapixels | Image resolution | 8000 x 6000 | 4368 x 2912 | Zoom | Digital | Digital | Flash | LED | LED | Stabilization | Digital | Digital | 8K video recording | No | No | 4K video recording | No | No | 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS | Slow motion | No | No | Angle of widest lens | 123° | - | Lenses | 4 (48 MP + 8 MP + 5 MP + 5 MP) | 3 (13 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP) | Wide (main) lens | - 48 MP - Aperture: f/2.0 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 0.8 micron - Sensor: 1/2.0", Samsung S5KGM2 (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus | - 13 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Pixel size: 0.8 micron - Sensor: 1/3.06", Omnivision OV13B - Phase autofocus | Ultra-wide lens | - 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 13 mm - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/4.0" (CMOS) | - | Macro lens | - 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Pixel size: 1.75 micron | Depth lens | - 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Pixel size: 1.75 micron | Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode | Selfie camera Megapixels | 20 megapixels | 8 megapixels | Image resolution | 5963 x 3354 | 3872 x 2592 | Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 | Pixel size | - | 1 microns | Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS | Sensor size | - | 1/3.06" | Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display | Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 | Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE, HID, A2DP | USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C | USB version | 2 | 2 | USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | NFC* | Yes | No | Infrared port | No | No | Network Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 | Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano | Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby | eSIM support* | No | No | Hybrid slot | No | No | LTE Cat* | 12 | 13 | 5G support | No | No | Speakers | Mono | Stereo | Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes | FM radio | Yes | No | Dolby Atmos | Yes | No | Category | Mid-range | Budget | Announced | March 2020 | August 2020 | Release date | April 2020 | August 2020 | SAR (head) | 0.49 W/kg | - | SAR (body) | 1.68 W/kg | - | Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint | - Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint | *Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country. These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Samsung Galaxy A31. It has a better display, software, battery life, and camera. You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
|