nếu xác định học mà bên đồ họa thì nên chọn NVS5200, nếu xác định chơi game thì hd7670m Show
@11030661tanh kiu bác....e tập tành đồ hoạ vs autoCAD, pts, proshow.....các kiểu game thì chỉ pes13 + ff3 + LOL thôi muốn chiến game này cơ mà tầm tiền 16 17tr chắc k đủ thôi đành ngậm ngùi v..... Minimum:
Recommended:
Chúng tôi so sánh hai GPU Nền tảng di động: 2GB VRAM GeForce 810A và 1024MB VRAM NVS 4200M để xem GPU nào có hiệu suất tốt hơn trong các thông số kỹ thuật chính, kiểm tra đánh giá, tiêu thụ điện năng, v.v. Asus G75VW - 736308G500G2 / i7-3630QM / 8x2.4GHz~3.4GHz / 8GB DDR3 / 1TB HDD / Geforce GTX 660M 2GB / 17.3" Full HD / win8 license Thế thì SG thẳng tiến thôi bác Cứ lên TP đi sẽ có nhiều em chân dài chào đón bác :p Kiểu gì mà ko đi qua Thủ Đức gần nhà em 1GB Nvidia Quadro NVS 5200M DDR5 không hiểu sao tìm cái này trên GPUboss không thấy nhỉ Các Bác cho em hỏi thằng này so sánh thế nào với GT 840m nhể @Hung135bác vào notebookcheck so sánh 2 em nó xem 😃 @Hung135Quardo chuyên đồ họa babj nhé. Nếu không nhầm thì Thua GT 840M. Dòng chuyên đồ họa Game không ngon đâu ạ. Nếu bạn ở SG, HN thì tham khảo tại Laptopnew bên mình nhé-Giá tốt và nhiều KM. Bạn cần tư vấn thêm vui lòng, PM YH:[email protected] hoặc Call Mr Quân 0965.18.19.18. Mình sẽ tư vấn thêm cho bạn 😁 yêu cầu bạn thì chiến con MSI này là rất phù hợp nè: dòng này mới vga khá mạnh: chiến tốt MSI GE60 2PC-235 Apache Core i5 4200H - 4GB - 750GB - VGA GTX 850M - Full HD Con MSI GE60 2PC-235 có bán ở Huế không các bác? còn nếu em muốn nội công mạnh thì chiến em nào mấy bác Android SDK (bữa Lap thằng bạn core i5-4200U (Asus - K) mà hơi lag lag khi bật thêm Chrome). Em sợ i5U vì xui xui nó lag thì toi em, app này em hay xài General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores134496CUDA cores1344no dataCore clock speed915 MHz625 MHzBoost clock speed980 MHzno dataNumber of transistors3,540 million585 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm28 nmPower consumption (TDP)150 Watt25 WattTexture fill rate102.5 billion/sec10.00Floating-point performance2,459.5 gflops258.0 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on GeForce GTX 660 Ti and NVS 5200M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Laptop sizeno datamedium sizedBus supportPCI Express 3.0no dataInterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXMLength9.5" (24.1 cm)no dataHeight4.376" (11.1 cm)no dataWidth2-slotno dataSupplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinno dataSLI options+no data MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5DDR3Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GBMemory bus width192-bit GDDR564 BitMemory clock speed6.0 GB/s1800 MHzMemory bandwidth144.2 GB/s14.4 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputsMulti monitor support4 displaysno dataHDMI+no dataHDCP+no dataMaximum VGA resolution2048x1536no dataAudio input for HDMIInternalno data TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. 3D Blu-Ray+no data3D Gaming+no data3D Vision+no dataOptimusno data+ API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)Shader Model5.15.1OpenGL4.34.6OpenCL1.21.1Vulkan1.1.126N/ACUDA++ Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms NVS 5200M by 758% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms NVS 5200M by 756% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms NVS 5200M by 456% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms NVS 5200M by 735% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms NVS 5200M by 672% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms NVS 5200M by 663% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms NVS 5200M by 575% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. Unigine Heaven 3.0This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine. Benchmark coverage: 4% GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms NVS 5200M by 703% in Unigine Heaven 3.0. Mining hashratesCryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 660 Ti and NVS 5200M. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 99 Mh/s 17 Mh/s Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 207718−20 3−4 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey24−27 +1100% 2−3 −1100% Assassin's Creed Valhalla18−20 +800% 2−3 −800% Battlefield 535−40 +875% 4−5 −875% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare30−33 +233% 9−10 −233% Cyberpunk 207718−20 +500% 3−4 −500% Far Cry 527−30 +867% 3−4 −867% Far Cry New Dawn30−35 +933% 3−4 −933% Forza Horizon 440−45 +1900% 2−3 −1900% Hitman 330−33 +2900% 1−2 −2900% Horizon Zero Dawn21−24 +2200% 1−2 −2200% Red Dead Redemption 218−20 +375% 4−5 −375% Shadow of the Tomb Raider24−27 +243% 7−8 −243% Watch Dogs: Legion21−24 +950% 2−3 −950% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey24−27 +1100% 2−3 −1100% Assassin's Creed Valhalla18−20 +800% 2−3 −800% Battlefield 535−40 +875% 4−5 −875% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare30−33 +233% 9−10 −233% Cyberpunk 207718−20 +500% 3−4 −500% Far Cry 527−30 +867% 3−4 −867% Far Cry New Dawn30−35 +933% 3−4 −933% Forza Horizon 440−45 +1900% 2−3 −1900% Hitman 330−33 +2900% 1−2 −2900% Horizon Zero Dawn21−24 +2200% 1−2 −2200% Metro Exodus16−18 +750% 2−3 −750% Red Dead Redemption 218−20 +375% 4−5 −375% Shadow of the Tomb Raider24−27 +243% 7−8 −243% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt21−24 +475% 4−5 −475% Watch Dogs: Legion21−24 +950% 2−3 −950% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey24−27 +1100% 2−3 −1100% Assassin's Creed Valhalla18−20 +800% 2−3 −800% Battlefield 535−40 +875% 4−5 −875% Cyberpunk 207718−20 +500% 3−4 −500% Far Cry 527−30 +867% 3−4 −867% Far Cry New Dawn30−35 +933% 3−4 −933% Forza Horizon 440−45 +1900% 2−3 −1900% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt21−24 +475% 4−5 −475% Watch Dogs: Legion21−24 +950% 2−3 −950% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare16−18 +467% 3−4 −467% Hitman 318−20 +350% 4−5 −350% Horizon Zero Dawn16−18 +143% 7−8 −143% Metro Exodus10−11 +900% 1−2 −900% Red Dead Redemption 28−9 0−1 Shadow of the Tomb Raider14−16 +250% 4−5 −250% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey10−12 +1000% 1−2 −1000% Assassin's Creed Valhalla7−8 0−1 Battlefield 521−24 +950% 2−3 −950% Cyberpunk 20775−6 +400% 1−2 −400% Far Cry 518−20 +500% 3−4 −500% Far Cry New Dawn20−22 +900% 2−3 −900% Forza Horizon 421−24 +1000% 2−3 −1000% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt12−14 +1200% 1−2 −1200% Watch Dogs: Legion6−7 0−1 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare8−9 +300% 2−3 −300% Hitman 310−11 +400% 2−3 −400% Horizon Zero Dawn10−11 +42.9% 7−8 −42.9% Metro Exodus5−6 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 26−7 0−1 Shadow of the Tomb Raider6−7 0−1 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt9−10 +800% 1−2 −800% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey6−7 0−1 Assassin's Creed Valhalla5−6 0−1 Battlefield 510−11 +900% 1−2 −900% Cyberpunk 20771−2 0−1 Far Cry 59−10 +200% 3−4 −200% Far Cry New Dawn12−14 +100% 6−7 −100% Forza Horizon 414−16 +1400% 1−2 −1400% Watch Dogs: Legion4−5 0−1 This is how GTX 660 Ti and NVS 5200M compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 11.33 1.32 Recency 16 August 2012 1 June 2012 Memory bus width 192 64 Pipelines / CUDA cores 1344 96 Memory bandwidth 144.2 14.4 Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 25 Watt The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 5200M in performance tests. Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 Ti is a desktop card while NVS 5200M is a mobile workstation one. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 660 Ti NVS 5200M Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:  Rate NVIDIA NVS 5200M on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
