How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?

Presidential Reconstruction

In 1865 President Andrew Johnson implemented a plan of Reconstruction that gave the white South a free hand in regulating the transition from slavery to freedom and offered no role to blacks in the politics of the South. The conduct of the governments he established turned many Northerners against the president's policies.

The end of the Civil War found the nation without a settled Reconstruction policy.

In May 1865, President Andrew Johnson offered a pardon to all white Southerners except Confederate leaders and wealthy planters (although most of these later received individual pardons), and authorized them to create new governments.

How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?

How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?
Read the Johnson's Pardon of 1865

How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?
See the Pardon document

Blacks were denied any role in the process. Johnson also ordered nearly all the land in the hands of the government returned to its prewar owners -- dashing black hope for economic autonomy.

At the outset, most Northerners believed Johnson's plan deserved a chance to succeed. The course followed by Southern state governments under Presidential Reconstruction, however, turned most of the North against Johnson's policy. Members of the old Southern elite, including many who had served in the Confederate government and army, returned to power.

The new legislatures passed the Black Codes, severely limiting the former slaves' legal rights and economic options so as to force them to return to the plantations as dependent laborers. Some states limited the occupations open to blacks. None allowed any blacks to vote, or provided public funds for their education.

How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?

How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?
Read the Mississippi Black Code (1865)

How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?
Read the Louisiana Black Code (1865)

The apparent inability of the South's white leaders to accept the reality of emancipation undermined Northern support for Johnson's policies.

How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?
Previous
How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?
Next
How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?

How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?

35a. Presidential Reconstruction

How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?

White House

Andrew Johnson, the 17th President of the United States, was pro-slavery throughout his career in the Senate and as the Military Governor of Tennessee.

In 1864, Republican Abraham Lincoln chose Andrew Johnson, a Democratic senator from Tennessee, as his Vice Presidential candidate. Lincoln was looking for Southern support. He hoped that by selecting Johnson he would appeal to Southerners who never wanted to leave the Union.

Johnson, like Lincoln, had grown up in poverty. He did not learn to write until he was 20 years old. He came to political power as a backer of the small farmer. In speeches, he railed against "slaveocracy" and a bloated "Southern aristocracy" that had little use for the white working man.

The views of the Vice President rarely matter too much, unless something happens to the President. Following Lincoln's assassination, Johnson's views now mattered a great deal. Would he follow Lincoln's moderate approach to reconciliation? Would he support limited black suffrage as Lincoln did? Would he follow the Radical Republicans and be harsh and punitive toward the South?

How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?

Riots rocked New Orleans on July 30, 1866, when a convention met to stop Louisiana's Black Codes from taking effect. Official reports listed 37 dead and 146 wounded, but witnesses claimed that the tolls were much higher.

Johnson believed the Southern states should decide the course that was best for them. He also felt that African-Americans were unable to manage their own lives. He certainly did not think that African-Americans deserved to vote. At one point in 1866 he told a group of blacks visiting the White House that they should emigrate to another country.

He also gave amnesty and pardon. He returned all property, except, of course, their slaves, to former Confederates who pledged loyalty to the Union and agreed to support the 13th Amendment. Confederate officials and owners of large taxable estates were required to apply individually for a Presidential pardon. Many former Confederate leaders were soon returned to power. And some even sought to regain their Congressional seniority.

Johnson's vision of Reconstruction had proved remarkably lenient. Very few Confederate leaders were prosecuted. By 1866, 7,000 Presidential pardons had been granted. Brutal beatings of African-Americans were frequent. Still-powerful whites sought to subjugate freed slaves via harsh laws that came to be known as the Black Codes. Some states required written evidence of employment for the coming year or else the freed slaves would be required to work on plantations.

How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?
How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?

These cartoons by Thomas Nast show Colombia (a personification of the U.S.) granting pardons to high-ranking Confederate leaders (which allowed them the full privileges of citizenship), but denying the vote to a crippled African American Civil War veteran.

In South Carolina, African-Americans had to pay a special tax if they were not farmers or servants. They were not even allowed to hunt or fish in some areas. Blacks were unable to own guns — and even had their dogs taxed. African-Americans were barred from orphanages, parks, schools and other public facilities. The Freedman's Bureau, a federal agency created to help the transition from slavery to emancipation, was thwarted in its attempts to provide for the welfare of the newly emancipated. All of these rules resulted in the majority of freed slaves remaining dependent on the plantation for work.

Andrew Johnson's policies were initially supported by most Northerners, even Republicans. But, there was no consensus as to what rights African-Americans received along with Emancipation. Yet a group of Radical Republicans wanted the rights promised in the Declaration of Independence extended to include all free men, including those who were formerly slaves. A political power struggle was in the offing.

How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?

Andrew Johnson
From the University of Virginia's Miller Center a quick biography of Andrew Johnson with lots more if you want to get more in-depth. If you need to do a report and want a "B" come here.

Report broken link

Reconstruction: A State Divided
In most places, Reconstruction began after the Civil War, but not in Louisiana. Union soldiers had defeated New Orleans early in the war, and had the opportunity to test out their Reconstruction strategy in the state of Louisiana before the fighting had ended everywhere else. See how they fared at this website, which includes a great variety of images as well as clearly written text. Don't miss the second page of the article, which concentrates on the experience of freed African Americans during this time.

Report broken link

"Everyone would, and must admit, that the white race was superior to the black, and that while we ought to do our best to bring them up to our present level, that, in doing so, we should, at the same time raise our own intellectual status so that the relative position of the two races would be the same."

-Andrew Johnson, 1866.
Learn More...

Report broken link

If you like our content, please share it on social media!

How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?
How did President Johnsons Reconstruction plan differ from Congressional Reconstruction?

How Congress Reconstruction plan differ from Johnson's?

The main difference between Lincoln's plans for reconstruction and Johnson's was in regard to the rights of freedmen following the conclusion of the Civil War. While Lincoln wanted to ensure rights, such as voting, for the formerly enslaved, Johnson's plan did not have these same requirements.

What was one major difference in Johnson's Reconstruction plan?

Andrew Johnson and Presidential Reconstruction Apart from being required to uphold the abolition of slavery (in compliance with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution), swear loyalty to the Union and pay off war debt, southern state governments were given free rein to rebuild themselves.

What was the major difference between Johnson's plan and the Republicans plan for Reconstruction?

Johnson's plan wasn't as willing to give as much freedom to newly free slaves as Lincolns was. Johnson wanted to give the land back to the south unlike the RR. Johnson's plan gave less protection to freed slaves then the Radical Republican's plan. Unlike the 10% plan, the plan they had wanted to punish the south.