Mà đang định mua AMD bác lại cho bài dìm AMD thế kia lm em hoang mag quá,chỗ em con Zotac GTX650 nó bán hơn 2tr4 lận Show
Sent from my GT-i9400 using Tinhte.vn mobile app @nhanvatitVấn đề nó nằm ở driver bạn ạ, nên mình nói thật, bạn lấy cái GTX650 cho yên tâm đi, max settings Dota2 nhé 😃 HN thì qua maytinhlongthanh.vn đó 😁 hoặc lấy Zotac GT740 đi, hiệu năng thua GTX650 có 5% thôi, mà giá rẻ hơn kha khá :D @nhanvatitOK đó bạn 😃 ngon trong tầm giá 2 triệu đó bạn, bạn mua đi 😁 Bạn có thể thêm 600k, tương đương 25% chi phí để lấy Zotac GTX750 mới nhất hiện nay, tiết kiệm điện và chạy mát hơn, và đặc biệt là mạnh hơn 60% so với GTX650. Thêm 25% giá tiền để được thêm 60% hiệu năng, mình nghĩ là nên đầu tư, dùng như vậy lâu dài hơn. @AC_Khanh01Thôi bác ạ,e dùng 1-2 năm là đổi máy ý mà,vs nhu cầu chỉ có dota 2 thôi,bh có quá lên con 750 thì k đủ sức,lấy con 650 là đc rầu Sent from my GT-i9400 using Tinhte.vn mobile app full hd dota 2 thì mua hd 7750 1gb ddr5 mạnh hơn gtx 650 1 chút. vấn đề driver là ngày xưa thôi. từ hồi ra dòng r driver amd đã đc cải thiện kha khá và rất tốt. bằng chứng là dân bitcoin săn sạch r9 @.@ mấy tháng đầu năm dân game ko có mà mua.=_= @Giang2511Bác ơi, dân bitcoin nó săn R9 là vì có mỗi R9 khả năng tính toán số học, các trường, vector của nó khi đó cao gấp 3 của Nvida còn chơi game vẫn kém chán. Chứ driver thì đâu vẫn thế ạ. @Giang2511Mình thấy các topic than phiền về driver VGA AMD vẫn còn kha khá @@ khi nào driver AMD tốt, thì bạn sẽ thấy mình tư vấn sang VGA AMD liền ah 😃 Mình thấy VGA AMD chơi bitcoin ngon, và như bạn nói là hết sạch R9. Còn chơi game thì đôi khi lại khác.... :| Em đang có nhu cầu mua VGA để chơi game online. hiện e đang phân vân giữa GT730 64 bit DDR5 và Gt630 2G - DDR3 128 bit. Về đánh giá hiệu năng thì e thấy genk.com.vn đã có bài test. theo như kết quả thì e thấy Gt730 DDR5 hơn rất nhiều so với Gt630 trong phân khúc tầm giá ấy. Nhưng e còn lăn tăn về Số bit. vì thấy dòng VGA cao cấp bây giờ đều dùng >128 bit. Nên bác nào có trải nghiệm thực tế về Gt730 DDr5 64 bit1GB rồi ( 1 thời gian đủ để đánh giá ) thì tư vấn giúp e với. E rất cần sự ổn định vì thế nên mong bác giúp đỡ ! tks ! Tên GPU GF108 GF106 Phiên bản GPU GF108-400-A1 GF106-250-KA-A1 Kiến trúc Fermi Fermi Nhà sản xuất TSMC TSMC Kích thước tiến trình 40 nm 40 nm Bóng bán dẫn 585 million 1,170 million Kích thước chết 116 mm² 238 mm² Card đồ hoạNgày phát hành Jun 18th, 2014 Sep 13th, 2010 Thế hệ GeForce 700 GeForce 400 Sản xuất End-of-life End-of-life Giao diện Bus PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16 Tiền nhiệm GeForce 600 GeForce 200 Kế vị GeForce 900 GeForce 500 Giá ra mắt — 129 USD Đánh giá — 80 in our database Tốc độ xung nhịpXung nhịp GPU 700 MHz 783 MHz Xung nhịp đổ bóng 1400 MHz 1566 MHz xung nhịp bộ nhớ 800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective 902 MHz 3.6 Gbps effective Kích thước bộ nhớ 2 GB 1024 MB Loại bộ nhớ DDR3 GDDR5 Bộ nhớ Bus 128 bit 128 bit Băng thông 25.60 GB/s 57.73 GB/s cấu hình kết xuấtCác đơn vị bóng 96 192 Đơn vị xử lý bề mặt 16 32 ROPs 4 16 Số lượng SM 2 4 Bộ nhớ đệm L1 64 KB (per SM) 64 KB (per SM) Bộ nhớ đệm L2 256 KB 256 KB Hiệu năng lý thuyếtTỷ lệ điểm ảnh 2.800 GPixel/s 6.264 GPixel/s Tốc độ làm đầy vật liệu 11.20 GTexel/s 25.06 GTexel/s FP32 (float) hiệu năng 268.8 GFLOPS 601.3 GFLOPS FP64 (double) hiệu năng 22.40 GFLOPS (1:12) 50.11 GFLOPS (1:12) Thiết kế bảng mạchChiều rộng khe Single-slot Dual-slot Chiều dài 145 mm 5.7 inches 210 mm 8.3 inches Công suất thiết kế 49 W 106 W Bộ nguồn khuyến nghị 200 W 300 W Đầu ra 1x DVI1x HDMI1x VGA 2x DVI1x mini-HDMI Đầu nối nguồn None 1x 6-pin Số bảng mạch P1070, P1071 P1060 Chiều rộng — 111 mm 4.4 inches Tính năng đồ hoạDirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_0) OpenGL 4.6 4.6 OpenCL 1.1 1.1 Vulkan — — CUDA 2.1 2.1 Mô hình đổ bóng 5.1 5.1 General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores19296CUDA cores192no dataCore clock speed783 MHz700 MHzNumber of transistors1,170 million585 millionManufacturing process technology40 nm40 nmPower consumption (TDP)106 Watt49 WattMaximum GPU temperature100 °Cno dataTexture fill rate25.1 billion/sec11.2 GT/sFloating-point performance601.3 gflops268.8 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no dataInterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16Length8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm)145 mmHeight4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no dataWidth2-slot1-slotSupplementary power connectors6-pinNoneSLI options+no data MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5DDR3Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed1804 (3608 data rate) MHz1800 MHzMemory bandwidth57.7 GB/s25.6 GB/s Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAHDMI++Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no dataAudio input for HDMIInternalno data API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)Shader Model5.15.1OpenGL4.24.6OpenCL1.11.1VulkanN/AN/ACUDA+2.1 Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. GTS 450 outperforms GT 730 by 59% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% GTS 450 outperforms GT 730 by 59% in Passmark. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% GTS 450 outperforms GT 730 by 32% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% GTS 450 outperforms GT 730 by 70% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. Octane Render OctaneBenchThis is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists. Benchmark coverage: 4% GTS 450 outperforms GT 730 by 50% in Octane Render OctaneBench. Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: 900p28 16−18 Full HD38 21−24 1200p27 16−18 Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 20776−7 3−4 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey5−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Battlefield 58−9 +60% 5−6 −60% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14 +62.5% 8−9 −62.5% Cyberpunk 20776−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Far Cry 56−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Far Cry New Dawn6−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Forza Horizon 410−12 +83.3% 6−7 −83.3% Hitman 37−8 +75% 4−5 −75% Horizon Zero Dawn5−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Red Dead Redemption 27−8 +75% 4−5 −75% Shadow of the Tomb Raider10−11 +66.7% 6−7 −66.7% Watch Dogs: Legion2−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey5−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Battlefield 58−9 +60% 5−6 −60% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14 +62.5% 8−9 −62.5% Cyberpunk 20776−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Far Cry 56−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Far Cry New Dawn6−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Forza Horizon 410−12 +83.3% 6−7 −83.3% Hitman 37−8 +75% 4−5 −75% Horizon Zero Dawn5−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Metro Exodus4−5 +100% 2−3 −100% Red Dead Redemption 27−8 +75% 4−5 −75% Shadow of the Tomb Raider10−11 +66.7% 6−7 −66.7% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt7−8 +75% 4−5 −75% Watch Dogs: Legion2−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey5−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Battlefield 58−9 +60% 5−6 −60% Cyberpunk 20776−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Far Cry 56−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Far Cry New Dawn6−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Forza Horizon 410−12 +83.3% 6−7 −83.3% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt7−8 +75% 4−5 −75% Watch Dogs: Legion2−3 +100% 1−2 −100% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare6−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Hitman 36−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Horizon Zero Dawn9−10 +80% 5−6 −80% Metro Exodus1−2 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 22−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Shadow of the Tomb Raider6−7 +100% 3−4 −100% 1440p Ultra Preset Cyberpunk 20772−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Far Cry 55−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Far Cry New Dawn0−1 0−1 Forza Horizon 44−5 +100% 2−3 −100% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt1−2 0−1 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare3−4 +200% 1−2 −200% Hitman 33−4 +200% 1−2 −200% Horizon Zero Dawn7−8 +75% 4−5 −75% Red Dead Redemption 22−3 +100% 1−2 −100% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey0−1 0−1 Far Cry 54−5 +100% 2−3 −100% Far Cry New Dawn6−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Forza Horizon 43−4 +200% 1−2 −200% This is how GTS 450 and GT 730 compete in popular games: 900p resolution:
1080p resolution:
1200p resolution:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 3.41 2.15 Recency 13 September 2010 18 June 2014 Cost $129 $59.99 Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB Pipelines / CUDA cores 192 96 Memory bandwidth 57.7 25.6 Power consumption (TDP) 106 Watt 49 Watt The GeForce GTS 450 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 730 in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTS 450 GeForce GT 730 Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:  Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
