Intel Core i5-11300H hoạt động với 4 lõi và 8 luồng CPU. Nó chạy ở 4.40 GHz base 4.20 GHz tất cả các lõi trong khi TDP được đặt ở 35 W .Bộ xử lý được gắn vào ổ cắm CPU BGA 1526 Phiên bản này bao gồm 8.00 MB bộ nhớ đệm L3 trên một chip, hỗ trợ các kênh bộ nhớ 2 DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4266 và các tính năng của 4.0 PCIe Gen 4 . Tjunction giữ dưới 100 °C độ C. Đặc biệt, Tiger Lake H được cải tiến với 10 nm và hỗ trợ VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . Sản phẩm đã được ra mắt vào Q1/2021
Home > CPU Comparisons > Core i5 11300H or Ryzen 5 4600H: what's better?
We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.6-3.1 GHz Intel Core i5 11300H with 4-cores against the 3.0 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 4600H with 6-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
What are the key differences between 4600H and 11300H
Advantages of Intel Core i5 11300H
- Supports up to 64 GB DDR4-3200 RAM
- Newer - released 1-year later
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than the Ryzen 5 4600H – 35 vs 54 Watt
- Newer PCI Express version – 4.0
- 23% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test - 1364 vs 1106 points
- 10% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.4 GHz vs 4 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
- Has 2 more physical cores
- More modern manufacturing process – 7 versus 10 nanometers
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 11300H and AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
| Vendor | Intel | AMD |
| Released | January 12, 2021 | January 6, 2020 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake H35 | Zen 2 |
| Model number | i5-11300H | - |
| Socket | BGA-1449 | FP6 |
| Integrated GPU | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | Radeon Vega 6 |
| Cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Base Frequency | 2.6-3.1 GHz | 3.0 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 26-31x | 30x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 4 GT/s | - |
| L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | 32K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 1280K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 8MB (shared) | 8MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
| Fabrication process | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| TDP | 28-35 W | 35-54 W |
| Max. temperature | 100°C | 105°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | Radeon Vega 6 |
| GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | - |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Shading Units | 640 | 384 |
| TMUs | 40 | 24 |
| ROPs | 20 | 8 |
| Execution Units | 80 | - |
| TGP | 15 W | 15 W |
| Memory types | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266 |
| Memory Size | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | - | 68.27 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 4600H or Intel Core i5 11300H?
|
|
Desktop 81% |
Workstation 65% |
|
|
|
Workstation 73% |
| Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed | 74.6 % | 77.1 % | +3% |
| Memory Avg. Memory Latency | 68.9 Pts | 73.9 Pts | Slightly lower memory latency. +7% | |||
| 1-Core Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed | 142 Pts | Much faster single-core speed. +33% | 107 Pts | |||
| 2-Core Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed | 262 Pts | Faster dual-core speed. +22% | 214 Pts | |||
| 4-Core Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed | 434 Pts | +0% | 432 Pts | |||
| 8-Core Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed | 654 Pts | 747 Pts | Faster octa-core speed. +14% |
| Memory OC Memory Latency | 81 Pts | 82.5 Pts | +2% | |||
| 1-Core OC Single Core Mixed Speed | 157 Pts | Faster OC single-core speed. +28% | 123 Pts | |||
| 2-Core OC Dual Core Mixed Speed | 306 Pts | Faster OC dual-core speed. +24% | 246 Pts | |||
| 4-Core OC Quad Core Mixed Speed | 501 Pts | +2% | 491 Pts | |||
| 8-Core OC Octa Core Mixed Speed | 731 Pts | 840 Pts | Faster OC octa-core speed. +15% |
Market Share
Based on 50,951,789 CPUs tested.| Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) | 0.14 % | 0.25 % | Much higher market share. +79% | |||
| User Rating UBM User Rating | 52 % | 57 % | Slightly more popular. +10% |
ADVERTISEMENT
Supersede of i5-9300H and i5-10300H. Performance wise, 8% improved from 10300H with a base clock of 3.10Ghz and turbo up to 4.4Ghz. 4C 8T still is very good enough for everyday tasking and most of the games. Recommended for low-end gaming laptop under $1200. [Jun '21 Gamejang]
MORE DETAILS
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
How it works
- - Download and run UserBenchMark.
- - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- - See speed test results from other users.
- - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.