Chip i7 8750H mạnh hơn nhiều so với 7700HQ nhé bạn . Render thì bạn cần CPU vs RAM nhiều , combo i7 8750H + 1060 đủ chiến những game nặng hiện nay rồi .
@laptopdell.vnem xem điểm thấy nó mạnh củng chỉ hơn tầm 20-30% ko biết có gọi là nhiều ko, còn con 1070 cách xa 1060 quá, cho nên phân vân qua
tùy nhu cầu bạn nha, nhưng theo mình nghĩ lấy combo 1 vừa đáp ứng tốt cả game lẫn render. Lấy cái 2 chỉ chuyên game thôi
Tuỳ nhu cầu của bạn là gì. Nếu chỉ chuyên chơi game thì combo 7700HQ + 1070 vẫn ngon hơn nhiều
Nếu render bằng các phần mềm adobe thì 8750H ăn đứt bạn nhé (6 core vs 4 Core) vì render quan trọng nhất là nhiều nhân CPU và ram. Còn VGA thì chỉ dùng để review là chủ yếu,trong khi con 1060 review 4K thoải mái -> chọn combo i7 8750H hợp lý hơn bạn nhé.
chênh 20~30% ko ăn thua, cùng lắm thì coi như con 8750H render mất 55 phút thì con 7700HQ chậm hơn 15-20 phút là cùng chứ mấy. Nhanh hơn 2-3 lần thì được, ko thì thôi. Em thấy bác chọn laptop thì render cũng phình phường thôi. Thôi thì em ủng hộ bác làm con 1070.
Hình như có sự nhầm lẫn gì ở đây, mình dùng Adobe premiere render bằng card rời, hiển nhiên là nhanh hơn nhiều.
Comparing Core i7-7700HQ and Core i7-8750H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance rankingPlace by popularitynot in top-100Market segmentLaptopLaptopSeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i7Architecture codenameKaby Lake-H (2017)Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)Release date3 January 2017 (7 years old)2 April 2018 (5 years old)Launch price (MSRP)$378$395Current price$1455 (3.8x MSRP)$824 (2.1x MSRP)
Technical specs
Core i7-7700HQ and Core i7-8750H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)Threads812Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.2 GHzBoost clock speed3.8 GHz4.1 GHzBus support8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/sL1 cache256 KB384 KBL2 cache1 MB1.5 MBL3 cache6 MB (shared)9 MBChip lithography14 nm14 nmDie size126 mm2149 mm2Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °CMaximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C64 bit support++Windows 11 compatibility-+Unlocked multiplier--
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-7700HQ and Core i7-8750H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration11SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1440Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-7700HQ and Core i7-8750H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2AES-NI++AVX++Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++Speed Shift++My WiFi++Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0Hyper-Threading Technology++TSX--Idle States++Thermal Monitoring++Flex Memory Access++SIPP--Smart Response+no dataStatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Security technologies
Core i7-7700HQ and Core i7-8750H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT--EDB++Secure Key++MPX++Identity Protection++SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® MEOS Guard++
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-7700HQ and Core i7-8750H are enumerated here.
AMD-V++VT-d++VT-x++EPT++
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-7700HQ and Core i7-8750H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4Maximum memory size64 GB64 GBMax memory channels22Maximum memory bandwidth37.5 GB/s41.8 GB/sECC memory support--
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card CompareIntel HD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics 630Max video memory64 GB64 GBQuick Sync Video++Clear Video++Clear Video HD++Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz1.1 GHzInTru 3D++
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-7700HQ and Core i7-8750H integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported33eDP++DisplayPort++HDMI++DVI++
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-7700HQ and Core i7-8750H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support++Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hz4096 x 2304@30HzMax resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2304@60HzMax resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2304@60HzMax resolution over VGAN/AN/A
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i7-7700HQ and Core i7-8750H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-7700HQ and Core i7-8750H.
PCIe version3.03.0PCI Express lanes1616
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 44% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 44% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 40%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 13% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 40%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 29% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 9% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 52% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 34% in 3DMark06 CPU.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Core i7-7700HQ outperforms Core i7-8750H by 37% in wPrime 32.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 52% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 52% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 9% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 9% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 71% in TrueCrypt AES.
WinRAR 4.0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 17% in WinRAR 4.0.
x264 encoding pass 1
x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 19% in x264 encoding pass 1.
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 46% in x264 encoding pass 2.
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 9% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 57% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.
Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 42% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.
Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Core i7-8750H outperforms Core i7-7700HQ by 9% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.
Gaming performance
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score 4.50 6.46 Integrated graphics card 3.08 3.07 Recency 3 January 2017 2 April 2018 Physical cores 4 6 Threads 8 12 Cost $378 $395 Boost clock speed 2800 2200 Base clock speed 2800 2200
The Core i7-8750H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-7700HQ in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-7700HQ and Core i7-8750H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Cast your own vote
Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.
Core i7-7700HQ
Core i7-8750H
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
User ratings: view and submit
Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.
Rate Intel Core i7-7700HQ on a scale of 1 to 5:
Rate Intel Core i7-8750H on a scale of 1 to 5:
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about Core i7-7700HQ or Core i7-8750H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.