Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 vs i3

Mini Review

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 advantages


Intel Core i3-3240 advantages


Q8200 vs i3-3240 performance comparison

The charts below show relative performance of Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core i3-3240 processors in various kinds of tasks. The numbers for 'Single-threaded performance' and 'Multi-threaded performance' charts are calculated as an average of several related benchmarks, that you can view in the "Benchmarks" tab. Consequentally, performance in individual benchmarks may be better or worse than what you see in the charts below. The 'Overall performance' calculates an average of all-around performance benchmarks, and benchmarks, specific to each application type.
   
  - Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200       - Intel Core i3-3240
   

A complete list of benchmarks, that demonstrate difference in performance between Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core i3-3240 in various types of tests, can be seen in the Benchmarks section.


Q8200 vs i3-3240 power consumption comparison

Thermal Design Power

Lower is better

 
  - Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200       - Intel Core i3-3240

Please see the Specifications section below for detailed side by side comparison of Core 2 Quad Q8200 vs Core i3-3240 specs. The CPUIDs section contains even more detailed comparison of internal features of both CPUs.


Pros and Cons summary

Core 2 Quad Q8200   Core i3-3240
General recommendations:   General recommendations:

Drawbacks:

 

Drawbacks:


Similar processors

Similar microprocessors use the same socket and architecture as Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Intel Core i3-3240, but their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.

Specifications

Market segmentManufacturerFamilyModel numberCPU part numberBox part numberIntroduction dateCore nameMicroarchitectureTechnology (micron)Data width (bits)SocketFrequency (MHz)Bus speed (MHz)Clock MultiplierL1 cacheL2 cache (KB)L3 cache (KB)Max temperature (°C)TDP (Watt)Max power dissipation (Watt)Core voltage (V)CoresThreadsMultiprocessingAMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technologyAVX / Advanced Vector ExtensionsF16C / 16-bit Floating-Point conversionMMXSSESSE2SSE3SSE4.1SSE4.2SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3Hyper-ThreadingPowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStepVirtualizationVirus Protection / Execute Disable bitGPU TypeThe number of controllers
  Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 Intel Core i3-3240
Desktop
Intel
Core 2 Quad Core i3
 
Basic details
Q8200 i3-3240
EU80580PJ0534MN
EU80580PJ0534M
AT80580PJ0534MN
AT80580PJ053HN
CM8063701137900
CM8063701247800
BX80580Q8200
BXC80580Q8200
BX80637I33240
BXC80637I33240
   
 
CPU features
   
   
   
64
Socket 775 Socket 1155
2333 3400
   
   
   
   
  3072
   
   
   
   
4 2
 
 
 
Instruction set extensions
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
Supported technologies
   
 
   
 
 
Integrated Graphics
   
 
Integrated Memory Controller(s)
   

Notes:

Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.

For detailed specifications of "Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200" or "Intel Core i3-3240" parts please click on the links in the table header.

Benchmarks

System setup

Below is a complete set of Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core i3-3240 benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. The former processor was tested on ASRock 4Core1600Twins-P35 motherboard with 2 GB dual-channel Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 memory, and Powercolor 24PRO256M DDR2 (ATI Radeon HD2400). The latter processor was tested on ASUS P8H61-M motherboard, that had 2 GB dual-channel Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9 DDR3 memory, and Integrated on-chip Intel Sandy Bridge graphics.

All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked. Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.

The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.


Core 2 Quad Q8200 vs Core i3-3240 single-threaded benchmarks

Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology. Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.

            

    Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200           Intel Core i3-3240

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark

Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.


PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark

Measures integer and floating-point performance of a single CPU core by running 6 different algorithms, and calculates a weighted score based on the results.


Super PI (1M) benchmark

Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 vs Core i3-3240 multi-threaded benchmarks

Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also helps to improve multi-threading performance.

                                    

    Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200           Intel Core i3-3240

CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark

Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.


CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark

Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.


Euler3D benchmark

Solves specific computational fluid dynamics problem, and reports a CFD cycle frequency in Hertz.


Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark

Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).


Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark


    Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200           Intel Core i3-3240

Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark


Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).


Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark

Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).


wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark

wPrime benchmark measures time taken by all logical processors to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431 (32M).

Core 2 Quad Q8200 vs Core i3-3240 graphics benchmarks

Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.

Important! The processors were tested using different types of graphics adapters, that may not be suitable for comparison.

        

    Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200           Intel Core i3-3240

3DMark2001 score benchmark

Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.


CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark

Core 2 Quad Q8200 vs Core i3-3240 memory performance

Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.

            

    Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200           Intel Core i3-3240

7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark

Estimates MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second) rating of a single thread by measuring data compression and decompression speeds, and dividing averaged result by the number of threads.


PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark

Measures performance of read, write and modify operations in main system and video memory.


WinRAR 3.71 (32-bit) compressing/decompressing speed benchmark

Measures compression and decompression speed of random data in KB per second


CPUIDs

The table below compares support for x86 extensions and technologies, as well as individual instructions and low-level features of the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Intel Core i3-3240 microprocessors. Information in this table was retrieved from actual processors using CPUID instruction, and we also utilized internal timer to measure CPU frequency. Be aware that all technologies, disabled in BIOS or by a virtual machine, will be shown as not supported. Different steppings of Intel processors may also have slightly different features. In rare cases, measured frequency may differ from official specifications.

ManufacturerCPU FamilyModel / Processor NumberMeasured FrequencyCWID versionPart number (supplied)Part number (guessed)S-Spec / Stepping Code
  CPUID 1 CPUID 2
Intel
Core 2 Quad Core i3
Q8200 i3-3240
2327 MHz 3391 MHz
0.5
EU80580PJ0534MN CM8063701137900
EU80580PJ0534MN CM8063701137900
  SR0RH

VendorProcessor name (BIOS)CoresLogical processorsProcessor typeCPUID signatureFamilyModelSteppingTLB/Cache details
GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3240 CPU @ 3.40GHz
4 2
4
Original OEM Processor
1067A 306A9
6 (06h)
23 (017h) 58 (03Ah)
10 (0Ah) 9 (09h)
64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 256 entries
Data TLB: 4-MB Pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Instruction TLB: 2-MB pages, 4-way, 8 entries or 4M pages, 4-way, 4 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 128 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
L1 Data TLB: 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 16 entries
64-byte Prefetching
Data TLB0: 2-MB or 4-MB pages, 4-way set associative, 32 entries
Data TLB: 4-KB Pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
Instruction TLB: 4-KB pages, 4-way set associative, 64 entries
L2 TLB: 1-MB, 4-way set associative, 64-byte line size
Shared 2nd-level TLB: 4 KB pages, 4-way set associative, 512 entries

Instruction set extensions

+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed

Comments (0)

Which is better Intel Core 2 Quad or i3?

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core i3-2100 3.1GHz is noticeably better than the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz when it comes to running the latest games.

Is Core 2 Quad q8200 good for gaming?

This processor performs extremely well on all banchmark tests for x86 and x64 busniess and game software for a great price. The Windows Experience Index Processor Subscore is 5.9, compared with 5.1 for a Core 2 Duo 2.3 GHz processor. The processor runs cool (35 deg. C) and the fan is completely silent.

Does Intel Core 2 Quad q8200 have integrated graphics?

This processor does not have integrated graphics, you will need a separate graphics card.

Chủ đề